An Overview of How Far We Have Come with the Kyoto Protocol

An Overview of How Far We Have Come with the Kyoto Protocol

The Kyoto Protocol is an international agreement between countries to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases. It was adopted in December 1997 and went into effect in February 2005 with the purpose of reducing global emissions by 2 percent below 1990 levels by The protocol also established commitments for participating countries to set specific targets for reducing their emissions, as well as a framework for monitoring progress towards achieving those targets. By doing so, it aimed to slow down the rate of climate change caused by human activities, such as burning fossil fuels and deforestation.

Countries Involved

Participating countries are those that have agreed to the Kyoto Protocol and have set binding targets for reducing their emissions. The United States is one of the only industrialized nations not to ratify the treaty, though it has taken steps towards becoming a participating country by signing an executive order in 2009 mandating reductions of greenhouse gases.

In addition to participating countries, there are also non-mandatory countries that have signed or ratified the agreement but do not commit themselves to any specific reduction targets. These include Japan, Canada, Russia, New Zealand and Australia among others. Non-mandatory countries often use various strategies such as carbon trading or emission credits to reduce their emissions without necessarily setting absolute limits on them.

The success of the Kyoto Protocol hinges heavily on participation from both mandatory and non-mandatory signatories alike in order for its goals to be achieved. As global climate change continues at an alarming rate, many argue that more stringent measures must be taken by both parties in order for meaningful progress towards fighting climate change can occur.

Emission Reduction Targets

Long-term emission reduction targets refer to the goals set by participating countries under the Kyoto Protocol with regards to reducing greenhouse gas emissions over a longer period of time. These target levels are negotiated on a country-by-country basis, and represent the most ambitious goals for reducing emissions that can be achieved by each nation. The goal of these long-term targets is to ensure that global climate change does not exceed an average temperature increase of 2°C above pre-industrial levels.

Short-term emission reduction targets are designed as intermediate steps towards achieving long-term emissions reductions goals. They focus on making progress in areas such as energy efficiency and renewable energy use which can have an immediate impact on reducing global emissions. Many countries have also implemented carbon pricing mechanisms, such as taxes or cap and trade systems, which create incentives for industries to reduce their own emissions in order to comply with short term targets.

In addition, some nations have gone beyond the requirements of the Kyoto Protocol and adopted voluntary measures aimed at further lowering their emissions beyond what is required through international agreements. For example, many European countries have enacted legislation requiring cars sold within their borders adhere to stringent fuel efficiency standards even before they become obliged under EU regulations such as those contained in Directive 2003/30/EC regarding CO2 Emissions from Passenger Cars Regulations 2004 (EU).

Successes of the Kyoto Protocol

The Kyoto Protocol has achieved significant successes in its efforts to reduce global emissions. One of the most notable is an increase in the use of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power among participating countries. This shift away from fossil fuels towards cleaner, more sustainable forms of energy has had a positive impact on reducing overall emissions levels.

In addition, many participating countries have seen substantial reductions in their own emissions levels since signing onto the treaty. For example, between 1990 and 2016, Japan’s total greenhouse gas emissions decreased by 4%, while European Union member states collectively achieved a 9% reduction during this same period.

This progress has been aided by various initiatives implemented by signatory nations including caps on carbon dioxide emissions for certain industries like power plants and factories; investments in research into clean technologies; incentives for businesses to adopt green practices; and measures targeting individuals such as taxes on vehicles with high emission levels or subsidies for those using public transportation or purchasing electric cars.

It is also worth noting that non-mandatory participants have made important contributions to the Protocol’s success through voluntary actions such as implementing carbon pricing systems or setting ambitious targets even when they are not required to do so under international law. By doing so, these countries have demonstrated their commitment to fighting climate change despite not being obliged legally under any agreement or treaty.

Failures of the Kyoto Protocol

One of the major failures of the Kyoto Protocol is its lack of binding targets for some of the world’s largest economies. The United States, China, and India are all absent from the agreement and have yet to commit to any emissions reduction goals. These countries account for more than half of global greenhouse gas emissions and their inaction has made it impossible for the Protocol to achieve its intended goal of reducing global emissions by 2 percent below 1990 levels by 2012 as initially envisioned.

Another significant failure has been that some participating countries have failed to comply with their commitments under the treaty. For instance, Canada withdrew from the Protocol in 2011 after failing to meet its required emission reductions target while Russia also missed a number of deadlines set out under its obligations since signing onto the agreement in As such, these two countries were not able to make meaningful contributions towards achieving Kyoto’s ultimate aim which further weakened its effectiveness overall.

A final criticism regarding Kyoto relates to what many deem an inadequate framework when it comes addressing non-mandatory participants who often use carbon trading or emission credits as means for achieving only minimal reductions in their own emissions levels without having any real impact on global climate change efforts as a whole. This has led critics argue that international agreements like this should focus less on rewarding non-committal actions with easy solutions and instead prioritize those who are willing put forth substantial effort into tackling climate change through tougher measures such as setting absolute limits on emissions or implementing policy changes targeting individuals rather than businesses alone.


In conclusion, the Kyoto Protocol has achieved notable successes in reducing global emissions through its binding targets for participating countries and initiatives such as carbon trading or emission credits for non-mandatory signatories. However, it has also faced criticism due to a lack of binding commitments from some major emitters and inadequate provisions for those who only commit to minimal reductions in their own emissions levels.

Moving forward, it is essential that international agreements like this one focus on providing incentives for those willing to put forth substantial effort into tackling climate change rather than rewarding complacency with easy solutions. This could include setting absolute limits on emissions or implementing policy changes targeting individuals rather than businesses alone. Additionally, continued dialogue between all stakeholders is critical in order to ensure that any future agreement builds upon the progress made by the Kyoto Protocol while addressing its shortcomings at the same time.

Scroll to top